AD's English Literature : Parent – Children Relationship in King Lear

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Parent – Children Relationship in King Lear

William Shakespeare's King Lear symbolizes first and foremost vastness. It is not intricate like Hamlet or deep like Macbeth or intense like Othello. And because it is vast and expansive, it yields itself to be viewed from many angles, not the least of which is the domestic angle; for is not a domestic play like Othello or Hamlet involving as it does the age – old problem of parent – children relationship?


The problem of this filial relation is an old one receiving as is does due and dominating delineation in the ancient Greek drama. Biologically also it holds it sway over generations of man. Shakespeare’s other tragedies like Hamlet or Othello and more so his historical plays deal with this perennial problem also reflects the past while the children stand in the present. There is sometimes what we now call a generation gap and than the battle between the past and the present assumes a fierce from till synthesis is born in a glorious future. Viewed as such, it becomes a dialectical approach in the Hegelian pattern unraveling the essential contradiction of the situation.

This domestic theme has been handled by Shakespeare before with much depth and intensity and intricacy; here he explores it in extent giving an impression of incomparable vastness and extending in the expansive process the royally domestic theme to the whole of humanity considered as a single family living under the same brooding stars and swept away at times by the same howling winds. There are some of the basic assumptions and contradictions which appear to emerge from a study of the domestic tragedies and an examination of the theme of parent – children relationship is bound to uphold this pattern in King Lear as well.

William Shakespeare
We have seen what happens from submission to father symbolizing authority and tradition (representing the past) in the destinies of Romeo, Henry or Hamlet. Cordelia in King Lear shows the outcome of a refusal to obey that same authority embodied in the father – figure of Lear, reminding us of the destinies of Juliet and Desdemona in Romeo and Juliet and Othello respectively. To sum up, disaster is the result in all these cause except for Henry V. in this filial relationship, Cordelia among the heroines appears diviner than other and seems to attract out sympathy most by virtue of her unmerited suffering and the divine quality of her love and race. Desdemona too is divine but a little different, her rebellious spirit freeing herself from the domination of the older generation represented in her father, Brabantio. In fact, Othello in this respect stands midway in these fats her play while two extreme ends are bodied forth in Hamlet and King Lear. In the former play (Hamlet) the son is converted to the code of his father with due acceptance of blood and revenge while in the latter (King Lear) the father is won back by his child (Cordelia) as Lear expresses his longing to pass the remainder of his life in the blissful company of his tender loving daughter. The sub – plot in the tragedy also shows the same question of filial relationship producing the same impression of a convulsing family world. Gloucester’s life is sought by the child he favours, the bastard Edmund while he in finally healed under the protecting care of the son he was wronged , namely , Edgar. The profound antinomies of the play are spelt out clearly by the dramatist solving in his own dialectical way the inherent contradictions. Cordelier’s love is an expression of order; Gloucester’s love a flaunting of anarchy; while the professed love of sinister Regan and Goneril is only the facade that merely hides the face of hate. Lear prefers flattering profession to sincere but silent devotion expressing in this the primeval fatherly instinct that loves domination and unrestrained authority over children and family. Lear hear is the great archetypal patriarch.

Where instinct dominates and it dominates so often as Man’s biological inheritance, judgment is a poor victim of circumstances. Both Lear and Gloucester, following their domination father – instincts, judge falsely among their children – one disowns the one good daughter and the other wrongs the good son – and thus suffer terribly in the process. It is to be marked here that in the underterriby in the process. It is to be marked here that in the under-plot that the principle of evil is active in every household of all degrees, legitimate or illegitimate.

The tragedy exposes the ill – will that Goneril, Regan and Edmund bear towards their father. It is difficult to call it unnatural for this is the common situation in the world. The clash of older generation with the succeeding one occurs chiefly in the material plain and over material issues – it is by and large a clash of selfish interest. The finer spiritual issues also engender a clash and make victims of Cordelia’s and Desdemona's of the world. They , however , do not die but carry the tradition beyond their deaths encompassing the past and the present and the future. Cordelia does it so here, as she takes Lear out of the purgatory of suffering to her paradise of loving peace. And in doing so, she perhaps reveals another very fundamental trait in final relationship. It is the mother instinct of the daughter for the father that comes to be revealed through an ineffable Cordelia – a Cordelia again who has no child and whose old father has entered his second childhood. It is a profound subject and Lear is just the occasion for Cordelia, a pretext to the daughter to serve as a support to the ineffable divine creation that is Cordelia. The chaotic universe of crimes, manias, miseries, follies and vices finds its virtuous justification in the shining vision of Shakespeare who like a God creates this tragedy bearing the tender motherly Cordelia in his brain. Amidst all the gloom, we are relieved to see Cordelia tending her helpless old child – like father, Cordelia with the young white breast near the old foolish father’s white bread. “There is no holier sight!” exclaims Victor Hugo for “such a filial breast is Cordelia’s”.


Ref: 1. History of English Literature- Albert
         2. Shakespearean Tragedies- A. C. Bradley     

No comments:

Post a Comment

Drop any query, suggestion or comment here.

About Me

My photo

An English Teacher;    M. A.(English) , D. Ed., B. Ed., UGC- NET Qualified

"Dear Readers/ Students, I am a huge fan of books, English Grammar & Literature. I write this blog to instill that passion in you along with the usual strong will  of  earning some money  through  selling ad space. I also feel proud to be in 'free' literature learning initiative because it will be more  easy to get and find you out there . Already thousand posts written and a few thousand healthy discussions made in this blog. And if  you want to contribute in writing or support in money,  you're welcome." 

You Can  Also Buy My Articles @ Teachers Pay Teachers