Attitude to War as Revealed in Wilfred Owen's "Strange Meeting": Deep Feelings of Sorrow and Compassion

“My subject is war, and the pity of war. The poetry is in the pity” – Wilfred Owen.

            Paradoxically enough Wilfred Owen began writing poetry in the tradition of the romantics with Keats and Shelley as his models Equipped with a Romantic sensibility, Owen might have written better poetry but circumstances ordained otherwise. The war provided Owen with subject matter, which turned the romantic elegiac strain of his early poems into the deep feelings of sorrow and compassion, which characterize his later poems.

            The idea of the futility of the soldiers’ sacrifice is the theme of Strange Meeting. It simply reflects the author's anti-war sentiment through vivid imagery and powerful language. In fact, it is a poem of visionary dream. The poet soldier imagines that he has escaped from battle and gone to the other regions. As he keeps watching the corpses, one springs up with piteous recognization in fixed eyes’. The poem begins with the horrors of war through vivid and grotesque imagery of a trench. The soldiers are covered in blood, and their bodies are mangled and torn apart. They are in Hell:

"It seemed that out of battle I escaped

Down some profound dull tunnel, long since scooped

Through granites which titanic wars had groined.

Yet also there encumbered sleepers groaned,

Too fast in thought or death to be bestirred.

Then, as I probed them, one sprang up, and stared

With piteous recognition in fixed eyes,

Lifting distressful hands, as if to bless.

And by his smile, I knew that sullen hall,— 

By his dead smile I knew we stood in Hell.' 

The other man in its cadaverous look, who is in fact the enemy soldier, relates the horrors and frustrations accompanying war. He is sad that he has been snatched away by death even before he could pass on to humanity the knowledge he acquired – the truth untold – the bitter experience on the battle field – the pity war distilled:

"“Strange friend,” I said, “here is no cause to mourn.” 

“None,” said that other, “save the undone years,

The hopelessness."

 He further voices against the abstract and unworthy glorification of war. An enemy in life becomes a friendly companion in the land of the dead, finally when disclosing his identity he bids friend to join.

Strange Meeting is the most emphatic of Owen’s imaginative statements of war experience. Striking in its crispness and brevity it is his best poem that has won for him a ‘passport to immortality’. The poem depicts war as a futile and meaningless endeavor that only leads to death and destruction. The soldiers' lives are wasted, and they suffer both physically and emotionally. War is organized brutality. Because of war, men retreat from their material progress and civilization. The poem no doubt highlights the horrors of war. It is also to ascertain eternal truths of love, amity and good will. Nevertheless, his decisions collapse because of the sudden termination of life. The poem Strange Meeting is an imaginative recreation of a supposed happening after death or even a process in the imagination of a living man after death. It is a livid experience.

            In Strange Meeting, the dead man, however, is displeased with the cause of his death. Sacrificing life for the sake of others is a noble act; but the glorification of war is both abstract and unworthy.

            The theme of universal goodwill, which Owen has been persistently advocating, seems reserved for the world of death where enemies become friends and engage in a discussion of their problems with an open mind. The poem underlines the theme of ‘insensibility’ also. The soldiers have grown insensible to pain and horror. It is paradoxical that the sense of goodwill does not exist where it is most needed and exists where it is not needed! Owen argues that war dehumanizes individuals, reducing them to mere pawns in a larger game. The soldiers lose their identity and sense of self, becoming mere cogs in the war machine.

            The death of a young soldier in the battlefield is nothing but a total waste of his undeveloped possibilities and talents through which he could serve humanity had he not joined the warfront to kill others and to be killed untimely by others. Owen argues that war is an artificial construct that creates a false sense of loyalty and patriotism. The soldiers are trapped in a cycle of violence that is perpetuated by those in power. In the poem, the ‘other’ mourns because of the waste of his years:

            “Courage was mine, and I had mystery,

            Wisdom was mine, and I had mastery

            To miss the march of this retreating world

                      Into vain citadels that are not walled”.

Perhaps he would have been able to undo the destruction brought about by the war, wash the blood-clogged wheels of the chariots with truth drawn from the unpolluted spring-well of our heart which is finest and deepest in the human spirit. The ‘other’ soldiers, Owen’s mirrored self who takes part in war kills and become killed – underlines the fact that while participating in a war, every young soldier sacrifices the possibilities of a noble achievement for pursuing a vain, inhuman, disastrous end.

            With a frank realism, free from the violent bitterness of so much of Sassoon’s poetry, Owen set out to present the whole reality of war – the boredom, the hopelessness, the futility, the horror, occasionally the courage and self – sacrifice, but, above all, the pity of it. Owen employs argumentative writing to convey its message. He encourages readers to reflect on the futility and devastation of war and to question the systems and ideologies that perpetuate it. In addition, never has the pity of war been more deeply felt or more powerfully shown in any other poem than Strange Meeting. His is the satire of war in Strange Meeting and is sharp, yet he never loses his artistic poise, and his most bitter work has a true dignity.

 Ardhendu De  


Further Studies on Wilfred Owen: Go to the link