Skip to main content

G. K. Chesterton’s use of Paradox in "The Architect of Spears"

Saintsbury, while introducing Chesterton and assessing his position in the history of English prose observes that Chesterton’s strength as a writer neither rely on any propensity of thought nor on any original point of view, but on the clear and witty way is which he expresses commonplace truths. Read More Essay Admittedly this thorough going vindicator of the romantic imagination has a charming style, at once splendid and perfect. A careful scrutiny of The Architect of spears reveals that the secret of Chesterton’s flawless artistry is his ‘love of paradox’. Paradox, incidentally, is a statement that seems to say something opposite to common sense (or the devious truth) but which actually contains a deeper truth. In his essay Chesterton, like show, widely uses paradox as a vehicle for promulgating his points of view. Legovis is right in her conclusion that he had made platitudes sparkle by clothing them in the outward form of paradox. The Architect of Spears best illustrates this. This is uniquely Chestertonian type of extravagant statement.

In this essay, The Architect of Spears Chesterton undertakes to explain the secret behind the unique greatness of Gothic architecture. The opening observation that an ‘optical illusion’ revealed to him the strange greatness of the Gothic architecture is itself a fine paradox. An optical illusion generally distorts a right and gives us a false idea of an object. And yet Chesterton paradoxically found a truth as he suffered such an illusion. Next, he critically examines the conventional explanations of Gothic majesty. The gothic emulates the classical in being such in a lively and mysterious way; the Gothic enjoys greater freedom in fusing the coarse with the sublime; our interest in such architecture is a course pleasure to be had in what is barbaric and rough, or , contrarily, a refined pleasure derived from the purity of the structure.Read More Essay [According to Chesterton, all the views are wide off the mark and unconvincing]. He, therefore summarily dismisses these views in terms of an inimitable paradox – ‘None of these explanations explain’. The paradox capitalizes on the inherent contradiction between Chesterton’s own outlook of Gothic sublimity and the equally plausible interpretation of the same made by others. The inadequacy of stock explanations, which take us to Chesterton’s ‘real point’, is reinforced through a crescendo of paradoxes:
                “They are varied, but it was not variety; they were solemn, but it was not solemnity; they were farcical but it was not farce”.
Incidentally what is presented as a ‘real point’ is, paradoxically enough, essentially a subjective one.

Chesterton once chanced to survey the Gothic structure of Lincoln Cathedral, hid behind a row of furniture vans. Since the author mistook them for cottages, in a moment of illusion, the stationary objects appeared paradoxically to be mobile. The leftward movement of the vans gave him an impression of the rightward mobility of the Cathedral. Instantaneously, the truth about Gothic – that it is ‘alive’ and ‘on the march’ – flashed to him. Chesterton weaves a network of subtle appeared to be ‘spears at rest’; the stones appeared to be ‘stone asleep in a catapult’; the arches resembled clashing swords and the engraved leaves looked like fluttering banners.

Read More Essay All these expressions are basically paradoxical, for they present an apparent contradiction – which resolves the mystery in the deep structure. To cap his own explanation of the secret of Gothic architecture, Chesterton even fancies hearing the voice of ‘the half military master builder, the architect of spears’. A master of paradox, Chesterton, clinches his argument with a comment on the ‘battle beauty’ of the ‘church militant’. Read More Essay It is worth mentioning here that Chesterton’s idea in itself is vague, nebulous and delicately incomprehensible. But his chiseled paradoxes give the airy nothing a local habitation and a name. Consider, for example, the use of the following paradox – “The silence was deafening with the mingle noises of a military march”.

The paradoxical proposition about the eloquence of silence here is highly effective in suggesting the combative force and the injecting of life in those dead stones. Such paradoxes are not truth, and yet they lead us to the truth. It appears that Chesterton thinks in terms of paradox directly.

Ardhendu De
     1.Orel, H. (1984). George Saintsbury. In Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (pp. 151–176). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17458-4_7

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Drop any query, suggestion or comment here.

Other Fat Writing

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Samuel Johnson's "Preface to Shakespeare": Points to Remember

E ighteenth-century writer Samuel Johnson ((1709-1784) is one of the most significant figures in English literature. His fame is due in part to a widely read biography of him, written by his friend James Boswell and published in 1791. Although probably best known for compiling his celebrated dictionary, Johnson was an extremely prolific writer who worked in a variety of fields and forms. Chief Critical Approaches of Dr. Johnson are: Johnson tried teaching and later organized a school in Lichfield. His educational ventures were not successful, however, although one of his students, David Garrick, later famous as an actor, became a lifelong friend.
40 comments
Read more

Kinds of Poetry: Narrative, Lyric, and Dramatic

Introduction: Poetry is a form of literary expression that has captivated readers and listeners for centuries. It allows poets to convey their thoughts, emotions, and experiences in a condensed and artistic manner. While there are countless poetic forms and styles, poetry can be broadly categorized into three main kinds: Narrative, Lyric, and Dramatic. Each of these kinds has distinct characteristics, purposes, and examples that showcase the rich diversity within the world of poetry. Kinds of poetry :  There are three great kinds of poetic writing: Narrative, Lyric, and Dramatic. Narrative poetry: Narrative poetry tells a story with a plot, characters, and a setting. It  is one of the oldest and most straightforward forms of poetry. It tells a story, often in a chronological sequence, using poetic devices to create a vivid and engaging narrative. Some key points about narrative poetry include: Storytelling: Narrative poetry focuses on storytelling, using poetic language to c...
1 comment
Read more

Analysis of "Progress" by St. John Ervine as One Act Play

"Peace hath her victories No less renowned than war."- John Milton  (1608 - 1674)   Letters of State...Together with Several of his Poems ,  "To Oliver Cromwell" “Progress” by St. John Greer Ervine is a successful specimen of a one act play . It has not only a unity of theme (the abolition of war) the unities of time; place and action are also meticulously maintained. Thematically, “Progress”     is written against the background of the First World War in which thousands were butchered and many more became disabled for life. It left many mothers    childless and incredible number of widows and orphans. This insensible devastation has created diverse reactions in social thinking, and “Progress” by the Irish playwright St. John Greer Ervine is just the product of one of the strongest of these sentiments, namely the anti-war feeling of the post war modern age .  Through the basic conflict between two ideas- the point of view of ...
10 comments
Read more