The Study of Aesthetics and Creativity: How do Socrates, Plato and Aristotle differ?

-

 Introduction

The study of aesthetics and creativity is a crucial aspect of philosophy as well as literatures, and it has been discussed by various philosophers, critics and rhetoricians throughout history. Three prominent philosophers who contributed significantly to the topic are Socrates (469-399bc), Plato (428?-347 bc), and Aristotle (384-322 bc). These philosophers had the guru-shiswa parampora but had differing views on aesthetics and creativity, which led to fundamental differences in their approaches. In this essay, we will explore these differences.

Sources of Argument

Socretes
The principal sources of the argument in this essay are the philosophical ideas and teachings of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. These philosophers are considered teacher -disciples in relationships to be the foundational thinkers of Western philosophy, and their ideas have been studied and debated for centuries. Several critical conjectures are based on their writings, including Plato's "Republic" and "Symposium," Aristotle's "Poetics," and the dialogues of Socrates recorded by his disciple, Plato. These texts contain their theories and beliefs on aesthetics and creativity, and they are the primary sources for understanding their ideas. Scholars and philosophers  have different interpretations and analyses of the works of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. 

Theory of Aesthetic

Plato
Socrates was a philosopher who believed that beauty is inherent in things. "Socrates was the first to call philosophy down from the heavens and to place it in cities, and even to introduce it into homes and compel it to enquire about life and standards and good and ill." (Cicero, Tusculanae Disputationes) He believed that beauty could be seen in nature and that it exists independently of human perception. Socrates also believed that true beauty could only be found in the mind and that it was connected to the concept of the good. He believed that beauty is a reflection of morality and that the two are inseparable.

On the other hand, Plato believed that beauty is an abstract concept that exists only in the mind. Plato's theory of Forms states that everything we see in the physical world is a mere imitation of an ideal Form. Plato says, "The true lover of knowledge naturally strives for truth, and is not content with common opinion, but soars with undimmed and unwearied passion till he grasps the essential nature of things." Plato believed that the Forms were perfect and that the physical world was a flawed imitation. He believed that artists could not create true beauty because they were only imitating the Forms.

Aristotle, on the other hand, had a more practical view of aesthetics and creativity. Aristotle believed that beauty was a combination of form and function. He believed that a beautiful object not only looked good but also served its purpose well. Aristotle believed that art was a form of imitation that could lead to a better understanding of the world. He also believed that creativity was an essential aspect of human nature and that it was necessary for personal growth and development.

Theory of Creativity

In terms of creativity, Socrates believed that creativity was a form of divine inspiration. He believed that artists were not the creators of their works but were merely conduits for divine inspiration. Plato also believed that creativity was not a human invention but a divine gift. He believed that artists were only imitating the Forms and that true creativity could only be achieved by connecting with the divine. "The Republic" quotes the below conversation: And as to the painter, is he the creator or maker of something of this sort? Not at all. .... 'This,' he said, 'seems to me to be the most accurate thing to call him the imitator of that which others create.' 'Well then,' I said, 'would you call him one who produces an imitation which is three stages away from the real existence?' 'Yes, I would indeed,' he said.

Aristotle

Aristotle had a more practical view of creativity. He believed that creativity was a natural human ability that could be developed through practice and learning. Aristotle believed that creativity was a necessary aspect of human nature and that it was essential for personal growth and development.

Conclusion

The principal differences between Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle in defining aesthetics and creativity are significant. While Socrates believed that beauty was inherent in things, Plato believed that beauty was an abstract concept that exists only in the mind. Aristotle, on the other hand, had a more practical view of aesthetics and believed that beauty was a combination of form and function. In terms of creativity, Socrates and Plato believed that creativity was a form of divine inspiration, while Aristotle believed that creativity was a natural human ability that could be developed through practice and learning. As students, it is essential to understand these differences and to develop our own perspective on aesthetics and creativity, based on our experiences and beliefs. We must strive to be creative and to appreciate the beauty in the world, while also understanding the moral and ethical implications of our actions.

Ardhendu De 

Comments

Post a Comment

Drop any query, suggestion or comment here.

Recent Posts

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Samuel Johnson's "Preface to Shakespeare": Points to Remember

-
Image
E ighteenth-century writer Samuel Johnson ((1709-1784) is one of the most significant figures in English literature. His fame is due in part to a widely read biography of him, written by his friend James Boswell and published in 1791. Although probably best known for compiling his celebrated dictionary, Johnson was an extremely prolific writer who worked in a variety of fields and forms. Chief Critical Approaches of Dr. Johnson are: Johnson tried teaching and later organized a school in Lichfield. His educational ventures were not successful, however, although one of his students, David Garrick, later famous as an actor, became a lifelong friend.
Read more

Dr. West’s New Method of Teaching English :Its Merits and Demerits

-
Image
                 D r. Michael Philip West (1888–1973) conducted an extensive research and experiments on the problems of teaching English as a foreign language in India at the time of British rule . Read More Teaching English The new method is the outcome of his research. It stood as a reaction against the Direct Method. Going into more details, when Dr. West came to visit rural Bengal students (1913- 19) en route teaching job at Teachers’ Training College  at Dhaka, West's conclusions about English learning issues in Bengal, India were as follows: 👉Students spent about 10 hours a week on English study with extremely poor results. 👉Only a minority reached the Matriculation class due to health or financial reasons. Read More  Teaching English 👉Even in the Matriculation class, students lacked real reading ability, speaking fluency, and writing proficiency in English. 👉A 1919 Calcutta University Commission survey revealed similar concerns, with most respondents favoring mor
Read more

Milton's Use of Epic Simile in "Paradise Lost", Book-I

-
Image
"Three poets, in three distant ages born, Greece, Italy and England did adorn. The first in loftiness of thought surpass'd; The next in majesty; in both the last: The force of Nature could no further go; To make a third she join'd the former two." John Dryden  (1631 - 1700) English poet, playwright, and literary critic, 1688. Referring to John Milton in relation to Homer and Virgil.   Epic simile is, in simple words, an elaborate comparison that travels beyond the point of comparison and gives a complete poetic picture of some scene or incident suggested to the mind of the poet. They are used for illustration and ornamentation. They add dignity to the style. Such long-tailed similes stand by itself illuminating and beautifying much more than the ordinary narrative.
Read more