William Shakespeare's Sonnet No 116 (Let me not to the marriage of true minds..): Argumentative Technique
William Shakespeare's Sonnet No 116 (Let me not to the marriage of true minds..) is an emphatic Statement on the permanence of love, a love which by its very nature defies time. In Sonnet 116, Shakespeare explores the theme of love and presents an argument about the nature of true love. The sonnet employs various argumentative techniques to convey its message effectively.
William Shakespeare |
The sonnet assert that love is unalterable, irremovable and constant, that
" Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks
But bears it out even to the age of doom”
The sonnet begins with a clear and assertive statement. This opening line sets the tone for the entire argument by stating the poet's position on the subject matter. In order to establish this central thesis, Shakespeare uses a specifically argumentative technique. First he gives a proposal;
" Let me not to the mariage of true minds
Admit impediments - - - -- -- - -- "
Within his initial proposition tusks a definition of love -- love is “a marriage of true minds ", the word 'marriage' suggesting complete union of perfect merger, Shakespeare proceeds to argue and establish the validity of his proposition. Impliedly, Shakespeare defines what true love is by negating what it is not. He uses contrasting imagery and language to define love's constancy and steadfastness. He begins in the true fashion of a rhetorical argument by defining love in terms of negatives:
"Love is not love / Which alters when it alteration finds."
This challenges the reader's understanding of love and prompts them to consider the nature of true love. The sonnet henceforth employs several rhetorical questions to engage the reader and reinforce the argument. Added to that the repetition of "Love is not love," reinforces the central argument and emphasizes the poet's point of view. It adds to the sonnet's overall persuasive effect.
Thus, he first establishes his point that if any emotional attachment is removable, or if the object of such emotional involvement is transferable, then such emotion should not be confused with true love. True love for Shakespeare can never find any alteration or removal.
Shakespeare proceeds with argument with emphatic negation of any possibility of removal or alteration of love that he has just spoken of in lines 3 and 4 - - - - -- "oh no!"
Then he continues with his basic argument now proceeding to define in a straight forward manner what love really is.
“It is an ever fixed mark
That looks on tempests and if never shakes”
Shakespeare, thus, begins to offer images in order to establish his argument. He begins with the image of a beacon in a light - house a flashing light used especially to guide pilot when landing which constantly emits light and which can withstand the terrible tempests on the sea. Shakespeare suggests that love is such a faculty of the mind that it constantly emits light in the hearts of lovers who can with stand the tempest of life. He proceeds with another image in support of his argument in favour of constant nature of love.
" It is the stars to every wandering bank " ---
Shakespeare now compares love with the polestars, believed to be steadfast, never changing its position in the sky. As the fined position of the pole - star helps erring seamen to be guided back to their right course, similarly love can guide erring man in their journey of life to their right paths.
"Again he builds his argument in terms of negatives:
“Love’s not Time's fool - - - - - - -"
Shakespeare uses metaphors to enhance the argument and make it more persuasive. For instance, "Love is not Time's fool" compares love to a force that transcends the limitations of time and remains constant. Like a seasoned arguers, Shakespeare negates the idea that love is subservient to time. Love does not, unlike a fool, serve the whims and fancies of its master. Time is not the master of love. Though time can consume by its devouring power physical beauty ('rosy lips and cheeks "), it does not have the power to devour love. Thus he comes to his most emphatic statement that love as an immortal passion continues to exist through out time and will exist "even to the edge of doom ".
After the final assertion of thesis, he affects a distanced posture and throws his statement opens to evaluation or criticism. In a tone of mock - modesty he says:
" If this be error and upon me proved
I never writ, nor no man ever loved”
This is a very tactful way assisting the validity of this argument, because it is impossible to prove that Shakespeare never wrote poetry or that love never haunted the hearts of human individuals. Thus, he uses the argumentative technique in his Sonnet no 116 to a great triumph, concludes that love is essentially immortal, permanent, inarguable and unfathomable. Shakespeare uses this logical reasoning to support his argument. This form of reasoning suggests that if the poet's assertion about love is proven false, then his entire existence as a writer and the existence of true love itself would be called into question.
The sonnet indirectly appeals to authority by referencing the "marriage of true minds" and the idea that love remains steadfast "even to the edge of doom." This appeals to a higher power or universal truth to strengthen the argument's validity.
Overall, through the use of assertive statements, logical reasoning, metaphors, repetition, and other argumentative techniques, Shakespeare's Sonnet 116 presents a persuasive case for the constancy and enduring nature of true love.
Here are a few key techniques used in the sonnet:
👉Assertion
👉Definition
👉Rhetorical Questions
👉Metaphor
👉Repetition
👉Logical Reasoning
👉Appeal to Authority
References:
1. Shakespeare’s Sonnets : Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive. (n.d.). Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/Shakespearessonn01shak_201303
Comments
Post a Comment
Drop any query, suggestion or comment here.